Fundamental Differences Between Babies and Animals
The idea of using human babies for the things humans currently use animals for is not necessarily a bad idea. In fact it is actually a pretty decent idea. While there are some pretty obvious differences between babies and animals when it comes down to it they are not all that fundamentally different. Because of this it is completely feasible to use human babies to replace animals for what humans use them for.
There are two main things that humans use animals for. Their meat and their skin. Human babies lack neither of these and if you have ever touched a baby you know well that their skin is fair soft. As for the meat all you have to do is ask a cannibal what they taste like, and really you do not even have to do that, I mean, they must continue their cannibalism for a reason. There is also the nice little fact that since we would be using human babies instead of animals PETA would have nothing to complain about and go away.
Animals are usually raised to maturity on farms and require care and attention. Babies however are already sometimes grown from test tubes and only have to age a little before they can be used for their resources. The other option is to create farms that just have large numbers of women who are just eternally pregnant. That could even be doubled for use as a milk farm or used to sell the baby products at higher prices due to them being all natural.
Possibly the best reason to use babies instead of animals is that instead of having to protect all the endangered and even the non-endangered animal species out there we can just let them die off or even help the process along. This means no longer having to dedicate valuable resources to protecting these animals or their habitats. This means humans can have the whole planet to themselves. This leaves us free to expand even more as a species and eliminate the risk of overpopulation for a while longer. Of course, the fact that we would also be using babies for food and clothing, among other things, would also help with population control.
Due to babies having all the necessary elements for what humans use animals for, as well as easily and relatively quickly being able to be grown in farms or test tubes, removing the need to maintain other species, and helping limit overpopulation it is perfectly feasible for humans to use their babies for what they currently use animals. In fact it is actually quite logical to do so.
Filed under Miscellaneous | Comment (1)One Response to “Fundamental Differences Between Babies and Animals”
Leave a Reply
There is a difference between baby human skin and animal skin: animal skin is used (or was) for warmth, because animal skin comes with a lot of fur attached to it, whereas human baby skin had nearly none. Next to (for example) the hollow, long, and heat insulating fur of polar bears, baby human skin would be a very substitute, not to mention a baby human simply has less surface area for skinning use then a polar bear, even a baby one.